Publications
23456785 of 28
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Verification of activity data within the energy sector for the reporting to the UNFCCC, EU Monitoring Mechanism, CLRTAP and the EU NEC Directive using data from the EU Emission Trading Scheme
SCB.
SCB.
Responsible organisation
2006 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In Sweden, about 700 plants are included in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) for carbon dioxide (CO2), which was launched on the 1st of January 2005. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for collecting and reviewing the data.

For international reporting of emissions to the UNFCCC, EU Monitoring Mechanism, CLRTAP and the EU NEC Directive 1990-2004, activity data is mainly based on energy statistics from Statistics Sweden’s surveys. In some cases, additional data sources, such as companies’ environmental reports or direct information from the company, are used as a compliment. 

In this study, activity data, thermal values and CO2 emission factors from the largest 63 plants in the ETS (which account for 75% of the CO2 emissions from all plants within the ETS) in 2005 are compared with the energy statistics and analysed. Furthermore, this study presents different choices and recommendations of data sources for the international reporting for these plants. 

The results show that for 21 plants, accounting for about 49% of the CO2 emissions of the 63 plants investigated, based on the Swedish energy statistics, no significant difference between the two data sources are identified.  

It was discovered during the project that not all plants in the energy production sector (CRF 1A1a) were included in the ETS data delivered by the Swedish EPA, and therefore many of the results on plants need further investigation to make correct comparisons. This report also gives suggestion on a few large industrial plants for which additional attention should be paid in future studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Norrköping: Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut , 2006. , p. 23
Series
SMED Rapport, ISSN 1653-8102 ; 2006:76
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
SMED (Svenska MiljöEmissionsData), Air and climate
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-11286OAI: oai:DiVA.org:naturvardsverket-11286DiVA, id: diva2:1962501
Available from: 2025-05-30 Created: 2025-05-30 Last updated: 2025-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Verification of activity data within the energy sector for the reporting to the UNFCCC, EU Monitoring Mechanism, CLRTAP and the EU NEC Directive using data from the EU Emission Trading Scheme(242 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 242 kBChecksum SHA-512
fe95d23b64bbd12c7aad6fbd9da6a5e30a122742f10838e7b94b36a834ad72518bd263fb5a7d24312afaa10d2a5e28f9044ad552b87abbaf2b3a531a39fcb9c7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 14 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
23456785 of 28
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf