Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bibliometrisk rapport Naturvårdsverkets viltforskning 2003–2014
Forskningspolitik Sverige AB.
Responsible organisation
2018 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]

Naturvårdsverket genomför 2017–2018 under ledning av forskningssekreteraren Per Sjögren-Gulve en utvärdering av viltforskningen som finansierats med medel ur Viltvårdsfonden åren 2003–2014. Utvärderingen består av tre delar: (1) en bibliometrisk analys av hur mycket forskningen har citerats (denna rapport), (2) en webbaserad enkätun-dersökning om viltforskningen och dess relevans bland intressenter som berörs av viltförvaltningen i Sverige (Naturvårdsverket rapport 6831), och (3) en summerande utvärdering under 2018 av en internationell vetenskaplig expertpanel.

Den här rapporten redovisar resultaten från den bibliometriska analysenav publikationerna som de finansierade viltforskarna 2003–2014 producerade.

Syftet med analysen var att åskådliggöra hur mycket forskningen som finansierats under perioden har citerats.

Abstract [en]

This bibliometric evaluation of wildlife research, funded by the Wildlife Management Fund through the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) during 2003–2014, highlights how the international publications have developed for the funded research leaders and co-applicants during the period 2006 until 2014. The following questions have guided the evaluation:

1) Has the SEPA programme for wildlife research payed off in relation to input of resources?

2) Has SEPA and its Wildlife Research Committee chosen the best available researchers for the projects?

3) Does SEPA’s funded wildlife research represent a reasonable project portfolio in an international perspective?

4) Does SEPA have a gender-wise equal distribution of research funds?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 50
Series
Rapport / Naturvårdsverket, ISSN 0282-7298 ; 6832
Keywords [sv]
Percentilmodellen, stora rovdjur, vilt, citeringsanalys
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-8625ISBN: 978-91-620-6832-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:naturvardsverket-8625DiVA, id: diva2:1497218
Available from: 2020-11-05 Created: 2020-11-05 Last updated: 2020-11-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2638 kB)44 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2638 kBChecksum SHA-512
14c1f563310b24f9351dd00c2facf495f5668609938433d54059f17538ec049244014b37ed833403fcf52825f8b8a4bad9a8158a7d2b8b6e7524204e9eea390c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 44 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf