Publications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Food waste volumes in Sweden
Responsible organisation
2013 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

3Our production, distribution and consumption of food have a significant impact on our environment. Considerable focus has recently been put on theneed to improve resource-efficiency in our society. Reducing the large volumes of food waste will be a key part of this challenge. It is also important toseparate and make biogas from the food waste that nevertheless is generated. The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Swedish EPA) has been working for a number of years to produce data and calculate food waste volumes – it is important to know how large these volumes are and where they are generated in order to monitor objectives andimplement appropriate measures and instruments.

This report summarizes food waste volumes for 2012 and presents recalculated figures for 2010. The volumes for each sector are given in Table 1 below. Each chapter contains a description of how thevolumes have been calculated.

As can be seen in the above table, households are responsible for the largest volumes of food waste. About 35 percent of their food waste is unnecessary food waste, i.e. food that could have been eaten if it had been handled differently (SMED 2011). There is currently no comprehensive data for agriculture and fishing (primary production). Only unnecessary food waste is presented for industry. If we were to include what is called “unavoidable” food waste, the total volume from industry would amount to 642,000 tonnes.

The differences between the 2010 data presentedhere and the data previously reported for 2010 (Jensen et al. 2010) are due to the fact that all waste factors have now been updated and the data is therefore more comprehensive than previously – the increase for 2010 is not therefore due to greater waste volumes but to an improvement in thecalculation method.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket, 2013. , p. 18
Series
Info-serien ; 8695
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Waste
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-10843ISBN: 978-91-620-8694-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:naturvardsverket-10843DiVA, id: diva2:1814707
Available from: 2023-11-27 Created: 2023-11-27 Last updated: 2023-11-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(863 kB)173 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 863 kBChecksum SHA-512
2b69a62d1d91573e3b77179f6708b2118b186222e27229f006d6efbfc0d3e998cd30ebce03537b34e66f90dc969a4d0a2ae900fab70254916c573969cc386a3e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 181 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 169 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf